A world-leading centre for the technical underpinnings of safe and ethical AI which is trustworthy to encourage responsible innovation and cutting-edge research breakthroughs. Our work connects broadly with inter-disciplinary experts, industry, government, regulators, civil society and other stakeholders to ensure that we build the right tools for society.
The key aim of this strategic challenge of the Turing’s AI programme is to establish a centre of excellence for the study of technical aspects of safe and ethical AI, in line with the government’s Industrial Strategy and in step with global demand for research and guidance in this domain. This will be achieved by conducting deep theoretical research, looking for rigorous, quantifiable and verifiable guarantees, and pushing the state-of-the-art frontiers, to enable trustworthy deployment. Key themes include:
- Advancing appropriate AI transparency and explainability
- Improving fairness of algorithmic systems, including ways to measure and mitigate bias
- Developing robust systems which adapt well to new environments, secure from attack and respecting privacy
- Developing systems that work effectively together with humans, maintaining appropriate human control and preventing undue influence
To achieve this, it will be vital to interface well with other disciplines, policy makers, industry and the public.
AI systems are rapidly being developed and deployed across society. This creates tremendous opportunities, but also raises a pressing need to ensure that these systems are safe and ethical in order to function properly, grow public trust and avoid a potential backlash.
What is missing in the UK landscape is a major effort to build the necessary technical foundations for this endeavour. Knowing how to regulate in a way that fosters innovation, while providing optimal guard rails for society, will not be possible without this effort. We propose to establish a centre of excellence for the study of technical aspects of safe and ethical AI at the Turing, to build the technical underpinnings for trustworthy deployment, responsible innovation and appropriate governance.
This is not a one-off endeavour but will require continual upgrading as the technology evolves. There are trade-offs between desirable goals for society (eg privacy and transparency, individual vs societal benefit). Our aim is to enable the best possible frontier across these goals and communicate with policy makers and the public to help ensure that the right point on the frontier is enforced.
- Cutting-edge research and knowledge generation disseminated widely and accessibly for maximum reach across research and user communities (industry, government, third sector and the public).
- Development of engaged research and business leaders to stimulate long-term culture and adoption of positive AI technologies.
- Upskilling of existing business and technical leaders to accelerate positive transformation.
- Collaborative delivery of scalable open-source prototypes and demonstrators, which in turn are used to build trust, engage users, and facilitate adoption.
- Informed policy makers who demonstrably refer to content generated by the new centre.
AI programme showcase
Watch this video to learn about the Turing AI programme, its background and purpose as well as its activities. If you would like to know anymore about the programme or discuss collaboration opportunities, please get in touch with the team [email protected]
Assessing the compatibility of fairness metrics used by the EU Court of Justice
The paper published by Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt and Chris Russell in March 2020, 'Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI', explains which parts of AI fairness can, cannot and should not be automated and suggests ideas for legally compliant algorithmic bias audits.
Forging new collaborative projects with global research communities
A workshop between UK, France and Canada, 'CIFAR-UKRI-CNRS AI and Society: From Principles to Practice' at the Turing, provided a forum for AI ethics researchers in the UK, France and Canada to meet and exchange notes on their recent work through a series of brief presentations. This utilised the Turing’s convening power to bolster the creation of cross-country research teams to apply for collaborative funding and at the same time raised the profile of the Institute in AI ethics across the UK, France and Canada.
Researching counterfactuals explanation for Google tools
Google's 'What-If Tool' as part of their TensorFlow™ machine learning framework, is an open source software library for high performance computation and a widely used deep learning framework. The tool enables non-technical individuals to easily understand what their machine learning is doing and allows the user to edit examples from datasets and show how the model’s predictions change as any single feature is changed.
View the code and references to the Turing researcher's work
Eliminating race and gender discrimination from automated systems
Turing researchers from diverse fields have produced a new way of approaching fairness in algorithm-led decisions, by looking at the causes of certain factors that can often result in biased decision-making.
Advice from Turing researchers, urging the need for individuals to have a legally binding right to have automated decisions made about them explained, is helping shape how the new EU data protection regulations will be implemented.
Turing researchers have also been developing methods to train machine learning models which do not discriminate against gender or race – published in 'Blind Justice: Fairness with Encrypted Sensitive Attributes'.
Promoting innovation and pioneering research
Yarin Gal, Group Leader on AI Programme and Turing AI Fellow, University of Oxford, has been named on MIT Technology Review's Innovators Under 35, Europe 2019 list in the 'pioneers' category. Professor Sandra Wachter, Turing Fellow and AI Programme Project Lead based at University of Oxford, has been featured in the Financial Times, reporting on her recent paper regarding online discrimination by association.