Starting with the identification of three core research projects, the programme’s activity has rapidly expanded. Additional research projects in our remaining two key challenge areas will begin before the end of the year, and several interdisciplinary research themes have evolved that cut across the Turing’s strategic partners. Our activities are driven by the programme’s goals of delivering world-leading research with real-world impact.
Developing state-of-the-art defences for computer networks
Every computer network is vulnerable to cyber criminals and hackers. Detecting attackers within a network is a complex task, and even skilled operators struggle to keep track of them all.
To bolster network defences and speed up response times, computer security organisations are increasingly looking to autonomous systems. Researchers led by the Turing’s Vasilios Mavroudis and Chris Hicks are exploring a technique called reinforcement learning – a field of artificial intelligence in which computer algorithms learn by solving problems through trial and error, with the goal of maximising a specified reward.
In 2022, the team won the first Cyber Autonomy Gym for Experimentation (CAGE) challenge, run by The Technical Cooperation Program. The team has made its code publicly available so that others can benefit from and expand upon this work.
Read the full case study as seen in the 2021-22 Alan Turing Institute Annual Report

Short-term projects aim to demonstrate immediate, meaningful impact
An announcement was made that the programme’s long-term work has been bolstered by a number of shorter, strategically important projects supported by funding from GCHQ. Each up to six months in duration, these projects aim to demonstrate immediate, meaningful impact, and address the key challenges that frame the defence and security programme.
The projects are focusing on a diverse range of applications including understanding hacker communities, adversarial machine learning, encryption, modelling of civil conflict, topological data analysis, and utilising game theory in cyber security. The projects are expected to yield academic impact through publications, and real-world impact through software, which will be released for use and further development.
The Manufacturer, the UK’s premier industry publication for providing manufacturing news, articles, and insights, published an article about the announcement.

Mapping conflict data to explain, predict, and prevent violence
Work produced by Turing Fellow Dr Weisi Guo is aiming to understand the mechanics that cause conflict and identify multi-scale population areas that are at risk of conflict. The research utilises the latest developments in complex networks and spatial interaction theory to model the effect of multiplexed regional-global interactions.
Findings have shown that ‘crossroad’ towns and cities where there are few other routes correlate strongly with data on violence; including terrorism, war between states, and gang violence. The work is building an evidence base which aims to help sustainable global development of infrastructure in order to reduce conflict.
Dr Guo was interviewed by BBC News about his work, the article going into depth about the potential ramifications of the work and the role of the Turing in the research.
Read the BBC article – “Can mapping conflict data explain, predict and prevent violence?”

Retool AI to forecast and limit wars
Turing Fellow Dr Weisi Guo and Director of Special Projects Sir Alan Wilson have written a comment piece for Nature, explaining how using artificial intelligence to predict outbursts of violence and probe their causes could save lives.
The piece details existing research being conducted into the forecasting of conflict, including the work of Guo and Wilson at the Turing. The piece identifies three things that will improve conflict forecasting: new machine-learning techniques; more information about the wider causes of conflicts and their resolution; and theoretical models that better reflect the complexity of social interactions and human decision-making. The piece goes on to propose that an international consortium be set up to develop formal methods to model the steps society takes to wage war.
Read the full Nature comment piece